without prejudice
OPINIONS
BOVAER: Experiment on Both Animals and Humans.
Last week, we published an article about the project Arla has launched to feed cattle with BOVAER which contains silicon dioxide, propylene glycol and 3-nitrooxypropanol (“3-NOP”).
FOOD vs. DRUG
ACCORDING TO THE FDA, BOVAER IS NOT A; FOOD, IT IS A DRUG.
There has been an enormous public backlash with the public boycotting Arla products and Arla’s partners.
There seems to be a lot that is unknown about this new drug being fed to dairy cattle. Considering it is what can only be described as an experiment on both animals and humans, it’s not surprising farmers and the public are outraged.
HEADS-UP - COWS vs HUMANS:
8.2 BILLION HUMANS produce flatus that contains methane, and
1.5 BILLION COWS worldwide produce flatus that contains methane.
If you would like an indication of which products Arla is potentially contaminating with its drug and so should be avoided, the Daily Mail has helpfully provided a list in its article:
‘Full list of Arla Foods’ Bovaer ‘contaminated’ products boycotted by customers: from Lurpak to Cravendale and even Starbucks, as controversial cow feed additive sparks backlash’.
The UK Food Standards Agency is insisting Bovaer is “safe.” A spokesman told MailOnline: “Milk from cows given Bovaer, a feed additive used to reduce methane emissions, is safe to drink.”
“CLIMATE CHANGE”
A HEAVILY DISPUTED THEORY
by the scientifically qualified
Climate Change Agenda is Synonymous with Pseudo-Science
On Monday, The Standard said, “On 26 November, Arla announced a new project that it hopes will cut the UK’s methane emissions. Methane is a greenhouse gas and contributes to climate change … The initiative is part of Arla’s wider commitment to reduce the environmental impact of its dairy production. The organisation is aiming to reduce its CO2 emissions by 30 per cent by 2030.”
Using the excuse “to reduce methane emissions” and “CO2 emissions” and then tying it to Agenda 2030’s deadline of 2030, should raise an immediate red flag to anyone who has done even a little research in the last few years.
There is no anthropogenic climate change crisis, and, as we mentioned in our article last week, methane is an important part of the biogenic carbon cycle. As we all know from primary school lessons, carbon dioxide (CO2) is the elixir of life, supporting plants since the world began and making virtually all life on Earth possible.
The whole false anthropogenic climate change narrative should have disintegrated in 2009 when the Climategate emails were released. But such is the determination, and money, of those who want to keep the UN’s agenda alive.
The Standard also reiterated the claim that Bovaer is safe, even though the outlet conceded that the UK Food Standards Agency said 3-NOP “should be considered corrosive to the eyes, a skin irritant and potentially harmful by inhalation” to humans handling it.
The Standard quoted an animal nutrition specialist at DSM, the first half in DSM-Firmenich which is the manufacturer of Bovaer, as saying “In every case, it [the additive] has proven safe for animal, farmer and consumer.”
How many “cases”? Under what conditions did it undergo extensive testing?
It seems The Standard didn’t ask these basic questions. Besides that, the news outlet should know better than to rely solely on a quote from someone whose livelihood depends on the success of Bovaer.
SAFE, TESTED & APPROVED by government regulatory agencies
MEANS JACKSHIT POST C19 injectables in 2024
Arla published a statement on Monday that said “Bovaer has undergone extensive testing to ensure it is safe for cows and humans.”
Yes, Arla would say that. Notably, Arla offered no proof to back up their statement. The world has long moved past the “trust me because I said so” stage. Perhaps Arla hasn’t realised that most of the population doesn’t trust the government, regulatory or public bodies, or the large corporations that stand to benefit from the various scams pushed by the controligarchs at the United Nations and the World Economic Forum.
So, has Bovaer “undergone extensive testing to ensure it is safe for cows and humans” as Arla claims?
Table of Contents
UK Food Standards Agency Assessment
US Food and Drug Administration Assessment
European Food Safety Authority Assessment
RED FLAGGED:
Assessment summary: UK Food Standards Agency Assessment
RED FLAGGED:
Assessment summary: US Food and Drug Administration Assessment (FDA)
RED FLAGGED:
Assessment summary: European Food Safety Authority Assessment (EFSA)
THREE MORE RED FLAGS:
Acknowledgement Original Sources
Credit to TikTok-handle: @justanothermiliking | TikTok-tagline: Running 90 Milking Cows, Farm's on My Own. Still living the dream #backbritshfarming #dairyfarming #oldfarmers #reformuk | TikTok-clip: 7443497972110789920 | TikTok-date-(AWST): December 4, 2024.
Credit to Rhoda Wilson EXPOSE-NEWS: Arla’s Bovaer food additive is not food, it is a drug. EDITORIAL December 4, 2024.
Share this post