Without prejudice
OPINION
Emma Dunwell of ESpeaksFreely went out to central London in attempt to gather interviews surrounding people’s views on the recent reports of 300 pride flags being taught to primary school children.
Emma Dunwell bumped into Monty and within 30 minutes he was arrested for exercising his right to free speech and freedom of expression.
Montgomery Toms was arrested in central London at a Pride Parade.
EXERCISING RIGHT of FREE SPEECH and of EXPRESSION
Although he was exercising his right to free speech and freedom of expression, in a public place - he was followed and then arrested, eventually leading to 11 officers gathering, and more arriving in a van.
Freedom of speech is being dangerously violated in this country and it’s about time people listen.
None of us have free speech until we all have free speech.
WHY IS REVERSE DEFENSE OF FREE SPEECH VILE
GROK 3 SEARCH
Reverse Defense of Free Speech [Search]
The case against unrestricted free speech often hinges on the harm it can cause. Words aren't just air—they can incite violence, spread lies that destabilize societies, or amplify hate that marginalizes groups.
The 2016 U.S. election, for instance, saw misinformation on social media sway voters, with studies suggesting fake news reached millions. Unchecked speech can also drown out marginalized voices through harassment or intimidation, creating a chilling effect where only the loudest or most vicious thrive.
Censorship, in this view, isn't about silencing dissent but protecting the public square. Governments and platforms might argue that curating speech prevents chaos—like stopping yells of "fire" in a crowded theatre when there’s no flame.
They’d point to real-world examples: Germany's laws against Holocaust denial aim to curb neo-Nazism, while content moderation on platforms reduces graphic violence or extremist propaganda. Data backs this up—X’s own moderation policies, for instance, have flagged and removed millions of posts for violating rules on hate speech or incitement since 2022.
On the flip side: restricting speech risks slippery slopes. Who decides what’s harmful? Power imbalances mean authorities or corporations can easily abuse censorship to silence critics or unpopular opinions.
Historical examples abound: dissenters in authoritarian regimes are often jailed under vague “public safety” laws. Even in democracies, overreach happens—look at the U.K.’s arrests over “offensive” social media posts, which critics argue target unpopular political views.
The tension is real: unrestricted speech can amplify harm, but curbs on it can erode freedom. Balancing the two without tipping into either chaos or control is the crux.
DEEP SEARCH REVERSE DEFENSE OF FREE SPEECH VILE
GROK 3:
Reverse Defense of Free Speech [Deep Search]
4cminews Grok:
This in Fact Is a Situational Ethics Position Has No Connection to LAW Of Right or Wrong Has Is Not Thereby Making This Practice Not Upholding the Law. [Deep Search]
Clearly If One Allows the Law to Be Subject to Allow the Application of Situational Ethics in Fact Make the Law Subjective. [Deep Search]
Conclusion and Implications:
The analysis confirms that allowing situational ethics to influence the law would likely make it more subjective, as it would prioritize context-specific, individually determined outcomes over consistent, objective legal standards.
This subjectivity is evident in the flexibility of situational ethics, which allows for breaking rules if deemed "loving" or beneficial, potentially leading to inconsistent legal outcomes.
The connection to equity in law highlights that some legal systems already incorporate situational considerations, but these are typically balanced with fixed principles to maintain objectivity, whereas situational ethics might push this further, risking legal chaos.
As of July 7, 2025, the tension between maintaining legal objectivity and allowing for situational flexibility continues to shape ethical and legal discussions, from philosophical debates to practical legal applications.
Future research and policy should focus on balancing individual fairness with legal consistency, ensuring that any incorporation of situational ethics does not undermine the rule of law while addressing unique circumstances that require flexible remedies.
This comprehensive analysis supports the user's query, highlighting that subjecting the law to situational ethics would indeed make it subjective, given its focus on context over fixed standards. ~ Grok
Acknowledgement Original Sources
Media Segment Credit to: Emma Dunwell | YT-handle: @ESpeaksFreely | YT-tagline: Montgomery Toms ARRESTED for wearing a sign at a pride protest. | YT-clip: EN9pcqBgEB0 | YT-date-(AWST): 6 Jul 2025 | 4CM-notes: 2025 JUL 06 UK Practices the Vile Reverse Defense of Free Speech.mp4
Media Segment Credit to: Emma Dunwell | 𝕏-handle: @ESpeaksFreely | 𝕏-tagline: Today @MontgomeryToms was arrested in central London at a Pride Parade. | 𝕏-clip: 1941604342685106237 | 𝕏-post: 1941604342685106237 | 𝕏-AWST-Timestamp: 5:05 AM | 𝕏-AWST-Datestamp: Jul 6, 2025 | 4CM-notes: 2025 JUL 06 Montgomery Toms ARRESTED for wearing a sign at a pride protest.
Share this post